Unveiling the Philosophy of Vision: Bridging the Divide between Microscopic Precision and Mirrored Perspectives in Dental Treatment

---

The Growing Adoption and Challenges of Microscope-Assisted Dentistry in Japan

Microscope-assisted dental treatment is gradually gaining traction in Japan, a country where traditional naked-eye treatment, often based on intuition, has long been the norm. Currently, approximately six percent of all dentists in Japan utilize microscopes during treatment. This shift can be attributed to the microscope’s ability to provide a much more accurate and detailed view of the treatment area than is possible with the naked eye. The magnification capability of dental microscopes, ranging from 3x to 20x, clearly demonstrates the superior precision offered by this technology.
However, the use of high-performance microscopes is not without its challenges. Similar to observing stars through an astronomical telescope with high magnification, the field of view through the microscope’s objective lens is limited. This constraint makes it more challenging to focus on the area of interest compared to using the naked eye. Additionally, since the focus is not automatic, dentists must manually adjust the focus each time to ensure that the treatment area is observed clearly. The objective lens is attached to the microscope arm, requiring movement each time a different part of the treatment area needs to be examined. These limitations have led to the emergence of practitioners, sometimes referred to as “refugees,” who struggle to use microscopes effectively. Nevertheless, the number of dentists employing microscopes continues to rise, largely due to the technology’s high precision.

Technical Challenges in the Use of Microscope

Upon mastering the initial challenges of using a microscope, dentists face a new set of obstacles, particularly the elimination of blind spots. Teeth are three-dimensional structures, arranged much like a series of upright buildings with minimal space between them. When observing teeth with the naked eye, the front (proximal) side of the teeth is easily visible, while the back (distal) side, closer to the throat, is more difficult to see. The same challenge arises when using a microscope. The greater the curvature of the tooth and the closer it is to the throat, the harder it is to observe. This is where a dental mirror becomes essential. By placing a mirror on the centrifugal side of the tooth, the otherwise hidden area is reflected on the mirror surface. When the objective lens captures the mirror’s reflection, blind spots are significantly reduced.

Mitigating Blind Spots in Dental Procedures

The more proficient a dentist becomes in using mirrors, the fewer blind spots they encounter. This reduction in blind spots, combined with magnification, allows the dentist to observe not only the treatment area but also the almost imperceptible interactions between the dental tools and the teeth.
Despite these advantages, using a mirror during treatment places considerable strain on the dentist. A helpful analogy is the experience of cutting one’s own hair while looking in a mirror—where the movement of scissors feels unnatural and distorted, and perspective is altered in a way that is difficult to describe.

The Complexities of  Perceiving Mirror Images

Many people mistakenly believe that a mirror image is simply a left-right inversion of the original. In reality, however, the image is reversed not only horizontally but also vertically. Furthermore, the image is flipped not just in the direction of movement but also in terms of depth. A mirror image, therefore, involves inversions in left and right, front and back, and includes a reduction in size, making it more complex to interpret and work with during treatment.

The Need for Guided Training and the Superiority of Combined Techniques

In dentistry, this concept applies when treating a patient while observing the image in a mirror. The movement of instruments, such as a drill, must be opposite to what is reflected in the mirror, requiring a different sense of distance and coordination.
　 Mastering the use of a mirror with a microscope is not something that can be achieved simply by telling oneself to “flip left/right” or “adjust back/forth.” Much like learning to ride a bike, where simply repeating “balance, balance, balance” is insufficient, mastering this technique requires comprehensive guidance from an experienced instructor. While some dentists may resist reverting to a student’s role, believing they can learn on their own, it is likely that proficiency in using a mirror is not a skill that can be self-taught, unless one possesses a natural aptitude for it.

The Ongoing Debate on Mirror Techniques in Dental Microscopy

In comparison to direct observation with the naked eye, using a microscope enables the dentist to more accurately discern the treatment area and the movement of instruments. However, as much as direct observation under a microscope is superior to the naked eye, it is inferior to the combined technique of using a microscope with mirrors. Dentists aim to provide minimally invasive treatment, and theoretically, they should not be satisfied with direct microscopic views alone but should strive to incorporate mirror usage to eliminate blind spots. Nevertheless, this practice has not yet become widespread.
Dentists who advocate for using a mirror with a microscope argue that their colleagues who rely solely on direct microscopic views are neglecting the essential skill of mirror technique. On the other hand, those who support direct viewing under the microscope believe that the microscope alone is sufficient for treatment and that learning the mirror technique is an inefficient use of resources, as the blind spot issue can be effectively managed through careful use of the microscope.
The divergence of opinion between these two groups should not be dismissed as mere negligence or worthlessness. Instead, it reflects their differing traditions and perceptions of “seeing,” which they may not fully recognize. The contrast between the two positions is as profound as that between a root fracture and a crown fracture.

Understanding the Divergence in Dental Microscopy Approaches

　The divergence between mere-microscope and microscope-with-mirrored-view approaches reflects deeper differences in traditions and perceptions of “seeing” in dentistry. While both methods aim to improve treatment precision, they represent fundamentally different approaches to visualizing and addressing dental issues.
The following presentation, available in both Japanese and English, delves deeper into the discrepancies between the mere-microscopic and the microscopic-with-mirrored-view approaches. This analysis aims to:

1. Elucidate the historical traditions that have shaped each school of thought
2. Explore the cognitive methodologies underpinning each approach
3. Provide insights into the potential future reconciliation of the schools in microscopic dentistry

By examining these aspects, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the nuances between these two approaches and their impact on the field of dentistry. This exploration will not only shed light on current practices but also inform future advancements in dental microscopy techniques.

　

Traditions of Representation and Perception behind the Two Treatment Methods, and a Way to Reconcile the Differences

---